Earthing Cable Sizing Calculator

Back to Tools

This calculator determines the minimum required cross-sectional area for protective earthing (grounding) conductors based on fault current, fault duration, and conductor material properties. It applies the adiabatic equation as per international standards like IEC 60364-5-54 and principles from IEEE Std 80.

Select Units:

Fault Current Parameters

Fault Current (kA)

Fault Duration (s)

Conductor Material & Temperature Properties

Conductor Material

Initial Conductor Temperature (°C)

Final Conductor Temperature (°C)

Conductor Type

Safety Factor

Safety Factor (%)

Earthing Cable Sizing Results

Parameter	Value

Conductor Type Recommendations

Choosing between a round cable and a flat bar/strip for earthing depends on various factors including fault current levels, installation environment, mechanical protection, and cost. Both types are widely used and recognized by international standards.

Cables (Round Conductors)

Pros:
- Flexibility: Easier to route in conduits, trays, and tight spaces.
- Cost-Effective: Often more economical for smaller cross-sectional areas.
- Insulation: Readily available with various insulation types for different environments.
- Common: Widely used for equipment earthing, protective earth (PE) conductors within circuits.
Cons:
- Heat Dissipation: Less surface area per unit volume compared to flat bars, which can limit their short-circuit current carrying capacity for very high fault levels.
- Mechanical Protection: May require additional mechanical protection in exposed areas.

Flat Bars/Strips (Busbars)

Pros:
- High Current Capacity: Excellent for carrying very high fault currents due to larger surface area for heat dissipation.
- Mechanical Strength: More robust and resistant to mechanical damage, suitable for main earthing bars, earth grids, and substation grounding.
- Neat Installation: Provides a clean and organized appearance for main earthing systems.
- Lower Resistance: Can offer lower impedance paths for high-frequency currents (skin effect).
Cons:
- Flexibility: Less flexible, making installation more challenging in complex routes.
- Space Requirement: Requires more space for installation compared to cables of equivalent current rating.
- Cost: Can be more expensive than cables for equivalent cross-sectional areas, especially for smaller sizes.
- Connections: Requires specialized connectors and careful jointing.

Recommendation: For general equipment earthing and protective conductors within electrical installations, **cables** are typically preferred due to their flexibility and ease of installation. For main earthing busbars, substation grounding, and applications involving very high prospective fault currents, **flat bars/strips** are generally recommended due to their superior thermal and mechanical characteristics.